What does General Winfield Scott's capture of Mexico City exemplify?

General Winfield Scott's capture of Mexico City exemplifies conventional 19th century warfare due to its reliance on organized military formations, set piece battles, and the application of traditional military tactics of the time. This approach emphasized the use of large armies, artillery, and offensive maneuvers in direct engagements against enemy forces.

Scott's campaign during the Mexican-American War included strategic planning, logistical support, and coordinated assaults on well-defended positions, leading to the successful occupation of the capital, which was a significant military objective. His utilization of siege tactics, movement of troops in formation, and decisive engagements align with the principles of conventional warfare practiced during that era.

In contrast, guerrilla warfare tactics emphasize irregular military actions aimed at weakening a more powerful opponent through ambushes and hit-and-run tactics, which were not the hallmark of Scott’s campaign. Similarly, the new approaches to naval warfare or unconventional warfare strategies were not central to Scott's operations, which were characterized by their traditional military structure and execution.