Which of the following is NOT an example of Functional Warfare Commanders?

The role of Functional Warfare Commanders is tied specifically to operational areas that require specialized tactical knowledge and the ability to manage specific types of warfare. Anti-Submarine Warfare Commanders, Air Defense Commanders, and Missile Defense Commanders all pertain directly to specific domains of combat operations. They lead and coordinate forces within their areas of expertise, focusing on countering threats in their respective fields, such as submarines, aerial incursions, and missile attacks.

In contrast, a Secure Telecommunications Group Commander does not fit this specific definition. That role is more focused on the management and integrity of communications rather than commanding forces in the context of a particular warfare domain. While communications are essential to successful military operations, the position does not fall under the category of Functional Warfare Commanders, who are responsible for direct engagement and management of operations in defined military disciplines. Thus, it is clear that this option stands apart from the others that are aligned with combat leadership in specific functional areas.